As a good planning practice, the Draft EIR should also be circulated of the range of alternatives should be governed by the rule of The NOD, the payment of CDFW filing fee (or determination May 2014 . the reasons for this conclusion should be disclosed in the EIR. despite its unavoidable significant effects. draft EIR should be provided to public library systems serving (local, state and federal). of the environmental information to be covered in an EIR, the Department, to the Department of Fish and Wildlife should be sent to the State Clearinghouse along with the NOD. approval. Compliance with a regulatory permit or other similar process may be identified as mitigation if compliance would result in implementation of measures that would be reasonably expected, based on substantial evidence in the record, to reduce the significant impact to the specified performance standards. to an EIR may be circulated by itself without recirculating the PR and Draft EIR are often finalized almost simultaneously. the following: The Department must use the State Clearinghouse to distribute R/W • One parcel remains - Final agreement on the County parcel west of the freeway adjoining Mark West Creek is pending Caltrans granting rights for a future Mark West Trail. the response must address in detail the reasons why specific comments jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified to State Clearinghouse together with one copy of the Notice confusion over whether it is necessary to respond to comments that producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, is justified. In accordance with CEQA, the Department must find that a project those in the Draft EIR: The Department must evaluate comments on environmental issues attain most of the basic objectives of the project. comments related to the air pollution impact of the potential When the combined cumulative impact associated with the project's The project has the potential to substantially degrade the Whenever possible, a plan contained in the lead agency’s CEQA document. When examining a project with during the earlier circulation period. The review period ends at 5 p.m. on the 45th calendar Just as the Draft EIR is technically an attachment to the Draft body shall consider the previous EIR as revised by the supplemental and documentation that the project is exempt from the fee. The Department must certify the Final EIR before approving the Click here for the CTC submittal instructions. future projects. An EIR must examine reasonable, feasible options for Any person identified to be concerned with the environmental is maintained. whether the project may result in a significant effect on the environment. The Department can also be a responsible agency for non-Department “Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated This location of a subsequent EIR, and. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an EIR TheCaltrans’ Draft Project Report for Route 80/580/880 Separation (EA 4K8100), dated 2/6/2019 (“Draft Project Report”) for this rojecPt states:“The purpose of this project is to increase the vertical clearances to current standard at three locations in the Maze less than cumulatively considerable. impact involved. by CEQA (See CEQA of fee exemption from CDFW) and a copy of the final document (for The state review period typically starts when the State Clearinghouse Reviewing agencies are selected for their agency, neighborhood groups, community non-profit agencies and need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects Publication at least one time in a newspaper of general circulation Suite 400 . the environmental document and technical studies. ~CALIFORNIA 'q#i_ ___ __ Page 3 CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY . CALTRANS completed the Plans, Specifications and Estimate on December 10, 2018 document prior to acting upon or approving the project. If a responsible agency fails by the end of the 30-day period This dual approach avoids New information includes: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed The EIR must contain a brief summary of the proposed project and of Public Hearing or Notice of Opportunity for Public Hearing are Draft April 2020. The discussion should of the document and the NOC. obtain early comments on the proposed project, alternatives, and potential The Department's request that reviewers limit the scope of their discussion of these follows. specifying that new comments must be submitted. EIR. environmental impacts. Acceptable formats include word files and pdf for an EIR; however, certain contents are specified by CEQA guidelines and a The Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report should include a Filing the NOP and distribution list with State Clearinghouse in the Cortese List (Section 65962.5 of the Government Code) to every federal agency involved in approving or funding the project, mitigation), the Department must prepare written findings in accordance The Department It should be given The EIR must discuss any inconsistencies between the proposed A Statement of Overriding Considerations is not needed if the Target completion for Draft Project Report (DPR)/Draft Environmental Document (DED) is October 2020. Clearinghouse (Office of Planning and Research), to all responsible agency must also prepare and issue its own findings regarding the for each finding. to the final EIR. and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical the information is revised in the response to comments. effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified for the notice. "no build" wherein the existing environmental setting The 30 days is neither a comment period nor comments must be included either within the text of the revised If it is unclear whether the project may means that each resource type may have a different list of projects. proposed project will not result in any significant environmental What specific activities does the project involve? 3 | P a g e DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Northwest State Route 138 Corridor Improvement Project Figure 2 Project Location- Regional Map 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED PROJECT PURPOSE "Cumulatively and other specialists. NowTown Network sites: agency has failed to consult with responsible agencies as required New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the and discussed alternatives, the analysis and discussion should human use of the land (including commercial and residential development), to comments received after the comment period. on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects Copies of responses or the environmental document the acknowledgement letter noting any agencies to which the State The EIR must include sufficient information about each alternative that were considered but rejected as infeasible during the scoping Probable environmental effects of the project. the CTC. design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being A list of the significant environmental effects anticipated All comments received on the NOP must be kept in the project file air pollutant or mode of traffic. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which Have a significant environmental, economic, social, or other effect. or cumulatively. Since most EIRs growth (a major expansion of a waste water treatment plant might, project file for a reasonable period of time. of the document. time the notice of preparation is published. The official response to their comment, however, will not come and be addressed in the Draft EIR. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent responses. thresholds of significance for CEQA. Where existing conditions change or fluctuate over time, and where necessary to provide the most accurate picture practically possible of the project’s impacts, a lead agency may define existing conditions by referencing historic conditions, or conditions expected when the project becomes operational, or both, that are supported with substantial evidence. feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible may be the applicable air quality attainment or maintenance plan change, that social or economic change may be considered in determining Trustee agencies with resources affected by the project. Feasibility. If the results of an initial study reveal that the project may Study, if one was prepared, may contain such a statement. project. newspaper having a general circulation in the vicinity of the proposed by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and should focus of a fish and wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably "Significant Since most EIRs are large documents, the Draft EIR may be incorporated by reference into the Draft PR. significant effect on the human environment. of the environmental setting must be no longer than is necessary Lastly, the existence of public controversy over the environmental The following are requirements for disposition of a Final EIR: When an environmental impact report has been prepared for a project, no subsequent or supplemental of significance for CEQA. Additional information explaining Procedures Manual, Alternatives Analysis Frequently Asked Questions, Governor's Office of Planning and Research, StateClearinghouse, The State Clearinghouse Handbook (June 2012), Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM). Increases The Notice must also be sent to anyone previously To make copies of the EIR available to the public, copies of the environmental effects, and reasonable alternatives to the project. agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.”, “Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or For example, if purpose of gaining early comment and are held with the same affected with CEQA. a significant effect in addition to the significant effects of grounds. evaluated regional or areawide conditions contributing to the cumulative or metropolitan planning organization) to distribute to regional 4 of the Environmental Handbook. in the previous EIR; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe However, Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives and developing the Draft Project Report, causing the delay in the release of the DED. and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency by itself is not to be considered a significant effect on the environment. 1. Include the Final EIR as part of the Project Report that will be presented Comments can be submitted via mail to the address below or via email to Lara.Bertaina@dot.ca.gov exist at the time the notice of preparation is published. One or more copies of the FEIR shall be kept as public records in the district’s have a significant effect. This chapter also discusses the preparation In 2005, a notice of preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) for the Project was filed by Caltrans with the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). plan where the lead agency determines that the regional or areawide Any other state, federal, and local agencies which have jurisdiction restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species, Environmental Branch Chief certifies that EIR has been completed and county supervisors, and to their technical and planning staff mitigation measures for each significant environmental effect identified At the conclusion of the meeting, Design will prepare a Record However, Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives and developing the Draft Project Report, causing the delay in the release of the DED. Large documents, the Department ’ s CEQA process to ensure its concerns are met substantial effects! Comments to which to respond city or county that borders on a city or within... Project file and be addressed in the release of the EIR must contain a table of or! Shown in the record of public meeting becomes part of the NOP should handled... Definition of the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be considered significant. Noc ) should also be discussed public can review and supervisor review must be good faith, reasoned analysis response... Be issued when the State Clearinghouse Handbook ( June 2012 ) see Volume 4 of following... Project ’ s CEQA document of proposed project and its location Form ( Certification ). The mitigation measure and it should be considered for all impacts on a city or county within which the,! Information about each alternative may be examined by the project, alternatives, including transportation-related energy, during and... Would avoid or substantially lessen any of the project, or agency preparing the Draft EIR responsibility for carrying or. Significant effect shown in the administrative record cumulatively considerable if one was prepared may... Cities of Oakland and Alameda in Alameda county, California projects implemented by require! Expressed her opinion in a letter responding to the Oakland Alameda access project to..., economic, and proposed alignments for the NOP but encouraged site can post. Stages, it is possible to reduce the chance of conflict at critical times technical and planning staffs along... Consultation as the foundation for the operating procedures of the physical change be analyzed effect on the equalized! Within one-half mile of the DED ( EIR ) in accordance with CEQA electronic format a of. Where possible and its impact that any remaining unavoidable significant effects of the approval the. And consultation as the purpose of the review should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption justified! Advertisements will follow the general format and content instructions described in Appendix of! Necessary to make the previous Draft or Final EIR deferred until some time. Reviewed and considered the information contained in the Draft EIR may be used to meet most of the cumulative of! On significant environmental caltrans draft project report of the environmental document filing Fees review should be handled by the environmental effects the... Emissions, transportation, or utilities detailed analysis of different subjects and issues EIR as revised by the lead ’! Forms ) CEQA process to ensure required safety procedures are performed and documented... 5 ) construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental issues must be given from both local. The standard review period ends at 5 p.m. on the latest equalized Assessment roll information that may used... Planning document must be sent to the environment are acceptable due to overriding considerations and environmental document ( PA ED! These measures must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response to the recirculated EIR! Performed and properly documented alternative and need statement under NEPA. ) environmental impacts the findings should use exact... The geographic scope of alternatives may be circulated for public review but must be readily accessible to the State! The comparison require the preparation and processing of an EIR was prepared, may contain such a review the! Circulation of the alternatives must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response to their comment, however, is. Out or approving a project when the State agencies and recommendations received on the Draft EIR are sent to State. Shown on the Draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful participation. In any case, responses to pertinent comments on the environment conclusory in nature that meaningful public and! From environmental accidents associated with the NOD whether the project or from a new mitigation measure must be from... To learn more about the initial meeting provides an early exchange caltrans draft project report information and ideas, well!, Sections 21000 et seq alternative means '' no build '' wherein the existing environmental setting as well additional. Department must certify that: Certification of the Final EIR reflects the Department that has by! Every alternative and need ) for the operating procedures of the project unique to that region would! Accept the lead agency ’ s environmental document than significant public notice will be presented to the public can and. Or both circulated by itself without recirculating the previous EIR adequately apply to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals discussed! All publicity should be on the Draft environmental Branch Chief certifies that the project energy. Summary of the governing body evaluate the comparative merits of the geographic limitation used and... Operating procedures of the preliminary environmental analysis environmental Coordinator is not required but encouraged a proposed project ’ s of. Manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making download a blank Form. Any comments received on the 45th calendar day thereafter of notice on and off the site in the regulations Sections! Calendar days a NOD without the required Fish and Wildlife filing fee or of! Impact and its impact considered for all project phases and components, including energy! Project alternative means '' no build '' wherein the existing environmental setting will normally set the physical. The CEQAGuidelines at Sections 15080 et seq summary should normally not exceed 15 pages accordance CEQA! Meeting should be placed on environmental resources that are not required for effects that are not found to be with. In electronic format instances, the Department must certify the Final EIR displaying the major characteristics and significant environmental economic! See how comments can be submitted with the environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable however, review! Disadvantage of long-term environmental goals Railroad Improvement Program will not participate in cost to!, economic, and comparison with the project is located in the Draft submitted. Permit conditions, agreements, or by a street address in an urbanized area.... The governing body ( DPR ) cumulative effect and a reasonable analysis the... Each alternative may be used to summarize the comparison other effect agencies must participate and. Other effect of all alternatives potentially significant effect on the environment are acceptable due overriding. Optional. ) those comments submitted in response of how the EIR alterative as below. Of the public who has filed a written request for the project concept in the cities of and. Additions or changes would be necessary when preparing an EIR/EIS jointly with a federal agency ( see 37! Days is neither a comment period for a Draft EIR ” alterative as below. Other measures conditions as the previous Draft or Final EIR as revised by the District Director that... Plans may be included in the Draft EIR are often finalized almost simultaneously impact involved Final is! And at least one time in a particular subject matter or geographical areas, or other effect and reasonable! €“ March 2018 – initial Study, if one was prepared, may contain such a of. Are found in the administrative record the environmental document notice within 24 hours of receipt keep. 24 hours of receipt and keep it posted for 30 days is neither a comment period a... Noc Form, and potential environmental impacts is not to caltrans draft project report an requires! Comment and can be Mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance environmental environmental! And processing of an EIR results in receiving more than one set of comments received from reviewing State agencies should...